Case Study: Anthem Herriman Sunday Overnight Refrigerator Water Line Emergency Response

Documentation of a Category 1 middle-of-the-night refrigerator water line failure emergency response in Anthem subdivision, Herriman, illustrating the distinctive response scope for overnight emergency events combined with Herriman’s elevated terrain (approximately 5,150 feet at this specific Anthem location) requiring substantial equipment adjustment. Property is a late-2000s Anthem single-family two-story residential property with main-floor kitchen configuration including built-in refrigerator with water dispensing and ice maker functionality requiring supply line connection. Event occurred on a July Sunday morning at approximately 3:14 AM when the refrigerator water dispenser solenoid valve experienced sudden failure producing continuous water release into the refrigerator interior and cascading through the refrigerator door onto kitchen hardwood flooring. Property owner was asleep upstairs and identified event at approximately 3:35 AM upon hearing water splashing sounds from kitchen area, descending to identify substantial flooding across kitchen and adjacent dining area. Documented outcome: Category 1 clean water emergency response scope covering 285 square feet across kitchen and dining area with IICRC S500 protocols, elevation-adjusted equipment deployment for Anthem’s approximately 5,150-foot elevation (17% capacity reduction versus sea-level specification), overnight emergency response with 52-minute arrival, comprehensive scope including hardwood salvage-attempted with Injectidry system, 6-day drying phase, and reconstruction, total scope $9,200 completing over 8-day comprehensive response timeline.

Property and Event Characteristics

Property Characteristics

• Subdivision: Anthem, Herriman, UT
• Property type: Single-family two-story residential
• Construction era: Late-2000s
• Floor plan: Standard two-story with main-floor kitchen adjacent to dining area, family room, and adjacent hallway; upstairs bedroom configuration
• Refrigerator configuration: Built-in refrigerator with water dispensing and ice maker functionality
• Refrigerator age: Approximately 5 years old (mid-service life)
• Water dispenser system: Solenoid valve controlling water flow to door dispenser and ice maker
• Elevation: Approximately 5,150 feet at this specific Anthem location (Herriman ranges 4,900–5,300+ ft; Anthem generally 5,100–5,250 ft)

Event Characteristics

• Date: July Sunday early morning
• Time of failure: Approximately 3:14 AM (identified from refrigerator diagnostic and water usage records)
• Time of discovery: Approximately 3:35 AM (property owner identified through water splashing sounds)
• Duration of exposure: Approximately 21 minutes from estimated failure to property owner isolation at refrigerator supply valve
• Source: Water dispenser solenoid valve sudden failure producing continuous water release into refrigerator interior with cascade through door onto kitchen flooring
• Failure mechanism: Solenoid valve internal component failure producing stuck-open valve position with continuous supply flow rather than cycle-controlled dispensing
• Category classification: Category 1 clean water (municipal water supply source; prompt discovery)
• Estimated water volume: Approximately 85–115 gallons total continuous flow during 21-minute exposure

Scope Extent

• Total affected area: Approximately 285 square feet
• Kitchen hardwood flooring: Approximately 165 square feet substantial saturation requiring specialty drying assessment
• Adjacent dining area: Approximately 85 square feet hardwood extension from water spread
• Refrigerator base and adjacent lower kitchen cabinets: Approximately 35 square feet cabinet floor area with saturation from cascade

Response Timeline

Overnight Emergency Response (3:38 AM – 4:30 AM)

• 3:35 AM: Property owner identified event through water splashing sounds; descended to kitchen
• 3:36 AM: Property owner isolated water at refrigerator supply valve after tracing source
• 3:38 AM: Property owner contacted Pure Flow 24/7 emergency line
• 3:44 AM: Emergency dispatch initiated with hardwood specialty equipment and Category 1 comprehensive response preparation
• 4:30 AM: Response team arrival (52 minutes reflecting Herriman 30–60 minute response range with overnight travel from Riverton HQ to Anthem elevated location; minimal traffic supporting middle-of-the-night response)

Initial Assessment (4:30 AM – 5:15 AM)

• Assessment of kitchen and dining area scope including hardwood extent and cabinet floor saturation
• Category 1 classification confirmed based on clean water supply source with prompt discovery
• Hardwood salvage assessment identifying moderate-to-substantial saturation without substantial cupping (favorable for prompt-response salvage-attempted approach)
• Refrigerator area assessment identifying cabinet floor saturation and adjacent framing exposure
• Scope development including specialty hardwood drying, cabinet floor removal, and refrigerator area access

Extraction Phase (5:15 AM – 7:00 AM)

• Truck-mount extraction from kitchen and dining area hardwood surface removing standing water
• Multiple extraction cycles given water volume from continuous supply flow
• Detail extraction from cabinet floor areas and refrigerator base
• Specialty extraction techniques for hardwood salvage support (avoiding aggressive extraction that could damage hardwood)
• Weighted extraction pads on hardwood supporting subsurface water reduction

Cabinet and Refrigerator Access (7:00 AM – 8:15 AM)

• Refrigerator removal from location supporting complete access to refrigerator wall area
• Cabinet floor removal from adjacent lower kitchen cabinets (approximately 35 square feet)
• Cabinet floor removal chosen over full cabinet replacement given salvageable cabinet upper structure
• Refrigerator base and adjacent framing assessment through targeted openings
• Wall assembly assessment through thermal imaging identifying moderate wall cavity moisture

Drying Phase Setup (8:15 AM – 9:45 AM)

• Equipment deployment (elevation-adjusted for 5,150 ft; 17% capacity reduction): 3 LGR dehumidifiers with 8 axial air movers plus Injectidry directed drying system for hardwood salvage support
• Equipment specifications: 2 Phoenix R200 LGR (approximately 166 pints/day adjusted combined at Anthem elevation), 1 Dri-Eaz DrizAir 2400 LGR (83 pints/day adjusted); total 249 pints/day adjusted
• Specialty equipment: Injectidry directed drying system with 8 injection ports across kitchen and dining area hardwood scope
• Air movement: 8 Phoenix Air Circulator axial air movers plus Injectidry-integrated air movement
• Antimicrobial application: Benefect Decon 30 applied across affected surfaces as prevention for Category 1 scope with 21-minute exposure

Drying Phase (Days 2–6)

• Day 2: Hardwood salvage assessment through Injectidry system confirming progressive moisture reduction; refrigerator supply solenoid valve replacement completed by appliance service technician
• Days 3–4: Progressive moisture reduction across kitchen and dining area hardwood; cabinet interior drying complete
• Day 5: Hardwood salvage confirmed successful for approximately 95% of affected hardwood; minor cupping in specific concentrated water contact area requiring assessment
• Day 6: Target moisture verified across all affected areas; drying phase complete; approximately 10 sq ft hardwood replacement warranted for irreversible dimensional instability

Reconstruction Phase (Days 7–8 parallel to drying completion)

• Cabinet floor replacement in adjacent lower kitchen cabinets
• Hardwood replacement in identified 10 sq ft area with dimensional instability; adjacent hardwood refinishing coordination for appearance consistency
• Wall cavity closure with any drywall repair required
• Refrigerator reinstallation with replaced solenoid valve
• Final cleaning completing response

Equipment Deployment Detail

Dehumidification (Elevation-Adjusted for 5,150 ft)

Anthem’s approximately 5,150-foot elevation produces approximately 17% dehumidifier capacity reduction versus sea-level specification (higher elevation adjustment than typical Rosecrest or Sunrise Meadows properties):

• 2 Phoenix R200 LGR: Adjusted to approximately 166 pints/day combined at Anthem elevation; positioned for kitchen and adjacent dining area coverage
• 1 Dri-Eaz DrizAir 2400 LGR: Adjusted to approximately 83 pints/day; positioned for supplemental coverage
• Total dehumidification capacity: Approximately 249 pints/day adjusted for 285 sq ft scope at 5,150 ft elevation

Specialty Hardwood Drying

• Injectidry directed drying system: 8 injection ports across kitchen and dining area hardwood scope providing directed drying supporting salvage
• Weighted extraction pads: Initial extraction supporting subsequent Injectidry directed drying
• Specialty hardwood monitoring: Daily hardwood dimensional assessment supporting salvage decision

Air Movement

• 8 Phoenix Air Circulator axial air movers: Positioned across kitchen (4 units), dining area (2 units), refrigerator area and cabinet interior (2 units)
• Injectidry-integrated air movement: Supporting directed drying performance across hardwood scope

Assessment Equipment

• Moisture meter: Delmhorst BD-2100 for hardwood and framing moisture measurement
• Non-invasive moisture meter: Wagner MMC220 for hardwood non-invasive assessment
• Thermal imaging: FLIR C5 for refrigerator wall cavity and adjacent area non-invasive assessment
• Hardwood dimensional assessment: Daily hardwood dimensional monitoring supporting salvage versus replacement decisions

Antimicrobial Application

• Benefect Decon 30 (EPA List N registered) applied across affected surfaces as prevention for Category 1 scope with 21-minute exposure

Technical Decisions

Overnight Emergency Response Considerations

• Middle-of-the-night failures produce distinctive response considerations including property owner alertness (property owner awakened by event), family coordination, and overnight response team dispatch
• Overnight response typically has faster travel time than daytime response given minimal traffic; this response achieved 52-minute arrival compared to typical 45–60 minute daytime Herriman response
• Property owner isolation of water source within 21 minutes of failure supported prompt response and Category 1 scope maintenance
• Overnight emergency response equivalent scope value to daytime response given 24/7 operations without overnight premium

Category 1 Classification with Prompt Response

• Category 1 classification maintained given clean municipal water source and prompt 21-minute exposure
• Prompt-response conditions favorable for hardwood salvage and comprehensive scope resolution
• Antimicrobial application applied as standard prevention for Category 1 scope

Hardwood Salvage Success

• Prompt-response 21-minute exposure with Injectidry directed drying deployment supported successful hardwood salvage for approximately 95% of affected hardwood (approximately 240 sq ft salvage; 10 sq ft replacement)
• Hardwood salvage substantially reduced scope value versus complete replacement (approximately $8–$20+ per sq ft hardwood replacement cost)
• Comparison to extended-exposure scope: prompt-response hardwood salvage typical 60–80% success rate for solid hardwood with Category 1; this response 95% salvage rate reflects prompt property owner response and prompt Pure Flow arrival

Elevation Adjustment for Anthem

• Anthem subdivision within Herriman generally 5,100–5,250 ft elevation depending on specific location
• This specific property location approximately 5,150 ft warrants 17% dehumidifier capacity adjustment (higher than typical Rosecrest 16% or lower Herriman 15–16%)
• Equipment specifications reflecting actual elevation adjustment supported effective drying phase performance
• Higher elevation adjustment across Herriman elevated subdivisions requires equipment planning specific to actual property elevation rather than general Herriman city elevation

Refrigerator Solenoid Valve Replacement

• Solenoid valve replacement coordinated by property owner with appliance service technician Day 2
• Solenoid valve typical replacement cost $150–$400 depending on refrigerator model and service scope
• Solenoid valve failure is repairable component failure rather than requiring refrigerator replacement
• Refrigerator age (approximately 5 years) supports continued service life with component replacement

Insurance Coordination

• Sudden and accidental refrigerator solenoid valve failure covered under property owner standard homeowners insurance policy
• Category 1 scope with prompt response typically fully covered
• Hardwood salvage-attempted approach documented supporting appropriate coverage
• Response scope including emergency response, extraction, drying phase, and reconstruction covered
• Refrigerator solenoid valve replacement itself not covered under standard policy; direct property owner responsibility

Outcome Summary

Timeline

• Emergency response to arrival: 52 minutes (overnight from initial contact)
• Arrival to drying phase active: Approximately 5.25 hours (extraction, cabinet access, refrigerator access, equipment setup)
• Drying phase: 5 days (Days 2–6)
• Reconstruction phase: 2 days parallel to drying completion
• Total scope timeline: Approximately 8 days from event to pre-loss condition restoration

Scope Value

• Total scope: $9,200
• Categories included: Emergency dispatch (overnight response), extraction, cabinet access, refrigerator access, drying phase equipment and monitoring (elevation-adjusted for 5,150 ft), specialty Injectidry hardwood drying system, antimicrobial application, reconstruction (cabinet floor replacement, hardwood replacement for 10 sq ft area, painting coordination, refrigerator reinstallation)
• Insurance coverage: Complete response scope covered under standard homeowners policy with applicable deductible
• Refrigerator solenoid valve replacement: Approximately $275 direct property owner payment to appliance service technician
• Scope value per square foot: Approximately $32 per sq ft reflecting hardwood salvage-attempted approach and cabinet floor replacement versus cabinet replacement

Client Outcome

• Complete restoration to pre-loss condition
• Successful hardwood salvage for majority of affected hardwood (approximately 240 sq ft salvage; 10 sq ft replacement)
• Cabinet floor replacement preserving cabinet upper structure appearance
• Refrigerator solenoid valve replacement with continued refrigerator service
• Property owner satisfaction with Anthem elevated-terrain overnight emergency response and hardwood salvage success

Overnight Response Learning Applied

• Overnight emergency response operations provide equivalent service quality to daytime response with 24/7 dispatch capability
• Property owner familiarity with water shutoff locations essential for prompt response regardless of time of day
• Middle-of-the-night failures with prompt property owner response and prompt professional arrival support favorable scope outcomes
• Leak detection sensors particularly valuable for middle-of-the-night failure scenarios providing early notification supporting prompt response
• Refrigerator area is common failure location warranting leak detection sensor placement

Related Content

• All Case Studies — complete case study documentation.
• Herriman Location Overview — complete Herriman coverage.
• Emergency Water Damage Herriman — 24/7 emergency response scope.
• Water Damage Restoration Herriman — complete restoration scope.
• Emergency Services Methodology — comprehensive emergency methodology.
• Structural Drying Methodology — specialty drying methodology.
• Contact Us — complete contact information.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do overnight emergency responses cost more than daytime responses?

No, Pure Flow emergency responses provide equivalent scope value regardless of time of day given 24/7 operations without overnight premium pricing. 24/7 emergency operations approach: Pure Flow operates 24/7 emergency dispatch with equivalent equipment availability, response protocols, and personnel qualifications regardless of time of day; overnight responses coordinate with same response protocols as daytime responses; equipment deployment specifications equivalent for overnight versus daytime scope; scope value calculated based on scope characteristics rather than time of day. Overnight response considerations: overnight response typically has faster travel time given minimal traffic; overnight dispatch preparation may take slightly longer than daytime given personnel transitions; overnight response team qualifications equivalent to daytime response teams; overnight response documentation equivalent to daytime response supporting comprehensive scope resolution. Industry standards: some restoration companies charge overnight premium pricing (typically 20–50% premium for overnight response); Pure Flow does not apply overnight premium reflecting 24/7 operations approach; property owner emergency response should not be delayed due to time-of-day pricing concerns; prompt response supports scope minimization regardless of scope value considerations. Response value: overnight response value comes from scope minimization supporting reduced total scope value rather than time-of-day pricing; prompt overnight response can prevent extended-exposure scope escalation; prompt overnight response can prevent cascade scope from extended supply flow; prompt overnight response can support hardwood and other material salvage. Response accessibility: 24/7 emergency line ensures property owner can contact Pure Flow regardless of time; dispatch coordination initiated within 15–30 minutes of contact regardless of time; response team arrival typical 30–70 minutes across service area regardless of time; equivalent service quality maintained throughout overnight hours. Property owner considerations: property owner should not delay emergency response due to time of day concerns; prompt overnight response typically results in more favorable scope outcome than delayed daytime response; property owner familiarity with water shutoff locations essential for prompt response regardless of time. This Anthem overnight response achieved 52-minute arrival, prompt scope assessment, and successful hardwood salvage supporting favorable scope outcome despite middle-of-the-night event.

Why is Anthem elevation adjustment higher than Rosecrest or Sunrise Meadows?

Anthem subdivision within Herriman is at slightly higher elevation than typical Rosecrest or Sunrise Meadows properties, producing modestly higher dehumidifier capacity adjustment factor. Herriman subdivision elevation variations: Anthem generally 5,100–5,250 ft (16–17% adjustment); Sunrise Meadows generally 5,000–5,200 ft (16–17% adjustment); Rosecrest generally 4,900–5,150 ft (16% adjustment); central Herriman lower elevations approximately 4,900–5,050 ft (15–16% adjustment); SunCrest-adjacent Herriman highest elevations approximately 5,200–5,400 ft (17–18% adjustment). Specific property variability: elevation within specific subdivision varies by property location (higher elevation properties within subdivision may be 100–300 ft higher than lower elevation properties within same subdivision); accurate elevation assessment during scope planning supports appropriate equipment adjustment; general subdivision elevation ranges provide guidance but specific property elevation may vary. Equipment adjustment implications: 1–2% additional adjustment factor may require additional dehumidifier or slightly extended drying timeline; comprehensive equipment planning accounts for actual elevation adjustment; adequate equipment capacity supports effective drying phase performance and prevents extended timelines. Anthem-specific considerations: Anthem subdivision development on elevated terrain within Herriman; property construction typical of late-2000s Herriman elevated-subdivision development; property owner familiarity with elevation-related considerations typical for Anthem residents. Practical impact: minor adjustment differences (16% versus 17% or 18%) don’t fundamentally change response approach; comprehensive equipment planning accommodates elevation variations; response quality equivalent across Herriman elevation ranges with appropriate equipment adjustment. Pure Flow response equipment planning for Anthem: elevation assessment during initial planning; equipment deployment specifications reflecting Anthem elevated location; response team familiarity with Herriman elevated subdivisions including Anthem. This Anthem response at 5,150 ft used 17% adjustment factor producing effective 5-day drying phase for 285 sq ft scope; adjustment factor supported successful hardwood salvage and comprehensive scope resolution.

Should I have a leak detection sensor near my refrigerator?

Yes, leak detection sensor placement near refrigerators is strongly recommended given refrigerator area is common failure location and sensors substantially reduce scope value for detected failures. Refrigerator failure risk factors: ice maker supply lines have documented failure rates from plastic supply line degradation and connection point stress; water dispenser solenoid valves have failure potential from age and mechanical stress; refrigerator drainage systems can produce leak development; ice maker components have failure potential; refrigerator age combined with continuous water system operation produces cumulative failure risk. Sensor placement recommendations: primary placement immediately behind refrigerator base near supply line connection; secondary placement adjacent to refrigerator in kitchen floor area capturing cascade scenarios; consider placement in adjacent lower cabinet if configuration supports; wireless sensors particularly appropriate for refrigerator location given placement flexibility. Sensor characteristics: leak detection sensors typical cost $20–$100 depending on capabilities and connectivity; battery-powered sensors typical 1–5 year battery life; wireless connectivity supports smart home integration and mobile notification; audible alarm for immediate notification; some sensors provide temperature monitoring supporting additional monitoring capability. Scope value impact: prompt sensor notification typically supports property owner isolation within 5–15 minutes of leak onset; prompt isolation substantially reduces total water volume and scope characteristics; scope value typically reduced 50–70% for prompt-response versus extended-exposure equivalent scope; sensor cost/benefit strongly favors installation for refrigerator area. Additional prevention combined with sensors: supply line replacement with stainless steel braided provides supply line reliability improvement; automatic water shutoff valve with leak detection integration provides comprehensive protection ($300–$800 installed for whole-property system); refrigerator-specific shutoff valve with leak sensor provides targeted protection ($150–$400 installed); combined prevention approach substantially reduces refrigerator failure scope potential. Installation considerations: sensor placement should not interfere with refrigerator operation or maintenance access; secure placement preventing dislodgement during cleaning; periodic sensor testing (typically annual) confirming functionality; battery replacement schedule (typically annual for battery-powered sensors); smart home integration configuration if applicable. For this Anthem property: property owner discussion regarding leak detection sensor installation near refrigerator; sensor installation completed during response reconstruction phase; property owner scheduled additional sensors for other water-risk locations (washing machine, water heater, sinks). Comprehensive sensor coverage combined with prompt property owner response supports substantial future scope prevention.

What is a refrigerator water dispenser solenoid valve and can it be repaired?

The water dispenser solenoid valve is an electromechanical component controlling water flow to the refrigerator door dispenser and ice maker; component failure typically requires replacement rather than repair. Solenoid valve function: electromechanical valve controlling water supply to refrigerator internal water system; valve receives electrical signal from refrigerator controls activating water flow to dispenser or ice maker; typically located inside refrigerator at rear compartment or bottom mechanical area; valve cycles open and closed thousands of times over service life. Failure modes: internal component wear producing stuck-open valve (continuous water flow rather than controlled cycling); internal component wear producing stuck-closed valve (no water dispensing or ice production); electrical component failure producing intermittent operation; corrosion or mineral deposit accumulation affecting valve function; connection point failure at inlet or outlet supply lines. Repair versus replacement: solenoid valves are typically integrated units rather than field-repairable components; individual component replacement typically not economical or practical; complete solenoid valve replacement is standard repair approach; replacement typical cost $150–$400 depending on refrigerator model and service scope. Replacement approach: appliance service technician typically performs replacement; replacement involves refrigerator access to valve location, supply line disconnection, valve removal, replacement valve installation, and supply line reconnection; testing after replacement confirming proper operation; replacement typically 1–3 hour service call. Service life expectations: solenoid valves typical service life 5–10 years depending on usage patterns and water quality; high water hardness may reduce service life through mineral deposit accumulation; heavy usage households may experience shorter service life; some units may have manufacturing defects producing earlier failure. Prevention approaches: water filtration reducing mineral content supporting valve longevity; periodic refrigerator maintenance including water system inspection; prompt attention to unusual dispensing behavior or ice production changes; annual visible inspection of supply line connections and valve area if accessible. Component replacement warranty: replacement solenoid valves typically have warranty coverage (typically 90 days to 1 year depending on manufacturer); appliance service warranty on labor typically 30–90 days; refrigerator manufacturer warranty may cover solenoid valve replacement for newer units within warranty period. For this Anthem property: 5-year-old refrigerator solenoid valve failure within typical service life range; component replacement standard repair approach; refrigerator continued service after replacement; property owner satisfaction with continued refrigerator function.

What happens if I can’t identify where the water is coming from during a middle-of-the-night emergency?

Middle-of-the-night emergency scenarios where source identification is challenging warrant immediate main water shutoff followed by professional response support for source identification and comprehensive scope assessment. Immediate response for unclear source: isolate main water supply at property water main shutoff (typically located in basement, utility closet, or garage); main shutoff eliminates all property water supply regardless of failure location; main shutoff substantially reduces scope potential from continuing supply flow; property owner familiarity with main shutoff location and function essential for prompt response. Main shutoff considerations: main shutoff typically ball valve or gate valve at water main entry to property; some properties have primary shutoff at property line requiring specific tool for access; ensure main shutoff functions properly through periodic testing (some valves become inoperable through age or corrosion); document shutoff location with photos for reference during emergencies. Professional response support: Pure Flow emergency line available 24/7 supporting middle-of-the-night emergencies; response team can support source identification during arrival; response team equipment includes moisture measurement, thermal imaging, and other assessment capabilities supporting source identification; comprehensive scope assessment during response identifies affected areas and appropriate response scope. Common source identification challenges: cascading water from upstairs failures can produce visible water in lower areas without obvious source; wall cavity failures may produce moisture indicators without visible water pool; slab leaks or foundation failures produce moisture from below with unclear source direction; multiple simultaneous failures during extreme weather events may complicate source identification. Property owner immediate response priorities: personal safety and family evacuation from affected areas if substantial flooding; main water shutoff to prevent continuing supply flow; contact Pure Flow emergency line; document scope with photos for insurance coordination; avoid electrical hazard areas (water contact with electrical outlets, appliances, or fixtures); avoid Category 3 contamination areas if sewage backup suspected. Do not attempt: aggressive investigation in affected areas without safety consideration; electrical system operation in affected areas; extensive DIY response for substantial scope; delay in professional response contact due to source uncertainty. Overnight response approach: middle-of-the-night professional response particularly valuable for unclear source scenarios; response team arrival provides objective assessment and source identification support; equipment and expertise support comprehensive scope response regardless of source identification challenges; response coordination supports property owner during stressful middle-of-the-night event. For this Anthem property: property owner identified source promptly through water splashing sounds; main shutoff at refrigerator supply valve appropriate for known refrigerator source; prompt response supported successful hardwood salvage and comprehensive scope resolution; property owner discussion regarding main water shutoff familiarity supporting future emergency preparation.

---

Contact Pure Flow Water Damage & Restoration — Anthem Overnight Emergency Case Study Reference

Comprehensive 24/7 emergency water damage response for Herriman including Anthem subdivision with equivalent service quality regardless of time of day. Typical 30 to 60 minute response reflecting Herriman travel from Pure Flow HQ at 5069 13400 S #400. Elevation-adjusted equipment deployment reflecting Anthem’s approximately 5,150-foot elevation (17% dehumidifier capacity reduction). Specialty hardwood salvage-attempted approach with Injectidry directed drying system capability. IICRC S500 water damage restoration and S520 mold remediation certification.

• Emergency Line (24/7): (385) 289-3753
• Address: 5069 13400 S #400, Riverton, UT 84096
• Email: info@pureflowwaterdamagerestoration.xyz
• Utah DOPL Contractor License: #13845621-5501 (S220 Small Commercial & Residential)
• IICRC Certifications: WRT, ASD, AMRT, FSRT

Contact Us →

Office Hours

• Emergency Service: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
• Office Staff: Monday – Saturday, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM
• Closed: Sundays and State/Federal Holidays (emergency line always active)